nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
From: Jonas Björk <mr.jonas.bjork () me com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 23:25:14 +0200
Because clients will switch to unicast for renewal. Also clients will stay with the current server forever, so you might have a bad distribution of load between the servers. If one server was down everyone will switch to the other and never go back until forced.
Why wouldn't they go back to the nearest server when it comes back online?
Regards Baldur
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?, (continued)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Kurt Kraut via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Ray Soucy (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Ben (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rob Seastrom (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jonas Björk (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Nick Hilliard (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Baldur Norddahl (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jonas Björk (Jun 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Larry Sheldon (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jonas Björk (Jun 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Larry Sheldon (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Baldur Norddahl (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Kurt Kraut via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Mike Meredith (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Baldur Norddahl (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Masataka Ohta (Jun 18)