nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 20:54:38 +0100
On 18/06/2015 20:51, Joe Abley wrote:
Since DHCP uses broadcast and multicast addresses when a client is discovering a server, it's not obvious why you'd have to.
most non trivial (i.e. routed networks) would use dhcp relay, in which case anycast dns could be argued to make some sense. TBH, the OP would be better off with multiple unicast installations with backup configured. Most decent quality dhcp implementations can operate in active/failover mode. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?, (continued)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Ray Soucy (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Kurt Kraut via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Ray Soucy (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Ben (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rob Seastrom (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jonas Björk (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Nick Hilliard (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Baldur Norddahl (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jonas Björk (Jun 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Larry Sheldon (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jonas Björk (Jun 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Larry Sheldon (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Baldur Norddahl (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Mike Meredith (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Baldur Norddahl (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Masataka Ohta (Jun 18)