nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set
From: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:21:20 +0200
On 17 Jun 2015, at 13:56, Maqbool Hashim wrote:
Any advice on this aspect would be great, unless considered off topic.
NANOG isn't really the right alias for this sort of thing. TCP port-scanning on TCP/0 is a common reconnaissance mechanism.Suggest you take this to a more appropriate alias like one of the bugtraq lists.
----------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Current thread:
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set, (continued)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Marcin Cieslak (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Pavel Odintsov (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Pavel Odintsov (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Mark Milhollan (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)