![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set
From: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:44:52 +0200
On 17 Jun 2015, at 11:34, Maqbool Hashim wrote:
What might be easier is to set up a span port for the hosts access port on the switch and grab that via the collector laptop I have.
It's better to collect as much information you have without perturbing the systems involved, anyways.
----------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Current thread:
- Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Marcin Cieslak (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Pavel Odintsov (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Pavel Odintsov (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Mark Milhollan (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Maqbool Hashim (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)
- Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set Roland Dobbins (Jun 17)