nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:34:53 -0700
For one thing a /32 is nowhere near enough for anything bigger than a modest ISP today. Many will need /28, /24, or even larger. The biggest ones probably need /16 or even /12 in some cases. Owen On Jul 14, 2015, at 12:53, John R. Levine <johnl () iecc com> wrote:
We're talking about end user assignments made by ISPs, not ISP assignments. An ISP's /32 is likely the only entry one needs in the FIB.In that case, why should anyone care how the ISP assigns space to its customers? R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion, (continued)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion George Metz (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion John Levine (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion John R. Levine (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Baldur Norddahl (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion joel jaeggli (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 14)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Chuck Church (Jul 14)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion John R. Levine (Jul 14)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Matthew Huff (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Nikolay Shopik (Jul 14)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Chuck Church (Jul 15)