Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

[Nikolay Shopik <shopik () inblock ru>]

Or wait ILNP/ILA https://lwn.net/Articles/647515/

> On 15 июля 2015 г., at 0:09, Matthew Huff <mhuff () ox com> wrote:
>
> Exactly.
>
> As a business entity and not a provider, we wouldn't have even contemplated deploying IPv6 without PI addresses. The 
> myth of easy renumbering and/or having multiple prefixes/address per host for failover still shows up from time to 
> time, but mostly gets ignored (at least in the corporate world). Remember SHIM? 
>
> Any reasonable size organization that expects reliable internet connections is going to go BGP/PI.
>
>
>
> ----
> Matthew Huff             | 1 Manhattanville Rd
> Director of Operations   | Purchase, NY 10577
> OTA Management LLC       | Phone: 914-460-4039
> aim: matthewbhuff        | Fax:   914-694-5669
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:50 PM
> To: Chuck Church
> Cc: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
>
> > What about dual-homed customers?  Or are they all expected to have their own
> > PI space?
>
> This is IPv6.  Why shouldn't they have their own PI space?
>
> R's,
> John