nanog mailing list archives
Re: NTP versions in production use?
From: Harlan Stenn <stenn () ntp org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:14:46 +0000
Harlan Stenn writes:
We will. But we're going to be asking them for support for network time. Folks like you are probably paying them for support. They'll listen more to people like you. This goes to *all* vendors who embed NTP in their products, we're not interested in in picking on anybody here.
Network Time doesn't *only* need support from network equipment providers. If accurate time is important to you, or you and your customers, please pitch in. I've probably strayed offtopic here. Sorry about that. But help us anyway. H --
-- On 7/11/15 8:21 PM, Dovid Bender wrote:You would need to ask Juniper that.... On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Harlan Stenn <stenn () nwtime org> wrote:Dovid, Thanks, and I'm kinda stunned that folks are running such ancient versions of NTP. https://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/ReleaseTimeline 4.2.0 was EOL'd in June of 2006, and we've fixed about 3,000 issues in the codebase since then. H On 7/11/15 7:58 PM, Dovid Bender wrote:Juniper MX5 root () YYY XXXXXX net> show ntp status status=06a4 leap_none, sync_ntp, 10 events, event_peer/strat_chg, version="ntpd 4.2.0-a Thu Mar 13 08:29:55 UTC 2014 (1)", processor="powerpc", system="JUNOS12.3R6.6", leap=00, stratum=3, precision=-18, rootdelay=90.375, rootdispersion=20.620, peer=29748, refid=208.75.88.4, reftime=d94c5338.ac6565a8 Sat, Jul 11 2015 22:45:12.673, poll=7, clock=d94c55ad.b634aa52 Sat, Jul 11 2015 22:55:41.711, state=4, offset=-0.428, frequency=2.394, jitter=3.505, stability=0.004 Juniper EX4200: root@YYYY> show ntp status status=c011 sync_alarm, sync_unspec, 1 event, event_restart, version="ntpd 4.2.0-a Sat Jan 5 18:41:34 UTC 2013 (1)", processor="powerpc", system="JUNOS11.4R6.6", leap=11, stratum=16, precision=-18, rootdelay=0.000, rootdispersion=656381.655, peer=0, refid=INIT, reftime=00000000.00000000 Thu, Feb 7 2036 1:28:16.000, poll=4, clock=d94c5a40.fa58e5f0 Sat, Jul 11 2015 23:15:12.977, state=0, offset=0.000, frequency=0.000, jitter=0.004, stability=0.000 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Harlan Stenn <stenn () nwtime org> wrote:Resending... On 7/10/15 12:29 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:I'm trying to build a list of the versions of NTP that are in activeuseon various active pieces of network gear. I know that Cisco, for example, uses NTP in around 10 different product lines, but I don't know what versions of NTP are in current use. I'm also curious about the answers here for Juniper and other network gear providers. That would include routers, switches, and other types of gear. If you have information about this I'd appreciate your letting me know.-- Harlan Stenn <stenn () nwtime org> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!-- Harlan Stenn <stenn () nwtime org> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!-- Harlan Stenn <stenn () nwtime org> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
Current thread:
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Harlan Stenn (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Dovid Bender (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Harlan Stenn (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Dovid Bender (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Harlan Stenn (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Harlan Stenn (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Harlan Stenn (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Julien Goodwin (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Tore Anderson (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Dovid Bender (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Stephen Satchell (Jul 11)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Mike O'Connor (Jul 12)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Alistair Mackenzie (Jul 12)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Bacon Zombie (Jul 12)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Ca By (Jul 12)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Jared Mauch (Jul 12)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 12)
- Re: NTP versions in production use? Harlan Stenn (Jul 12)