nanog mailing list archives
Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California
From: Mike <mike-nanog () tiedyenetworks com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:32:49 -0700
On 07/31/2015 06:27 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Can anyone else back that up (or refute it)?
I am a CLEC operating in California west, and I collocate with verizon. Yes, Verizon is proposing to sell it's wireline assets to Frontier and become effectively an all-wireless carrier.
Frontier is going to get a patchwork of ancient switches and poorly maintained outside plant, in rural areas that would require tens of millions of dollars in upgrades for sparely populaed areas it could never turn a profit on. I seriously wonder about the viability of taking on the debt to get those areas and even just maintain them, vz itself has done a very poor job and it presently operates a network where E911 routinely fails along with pots for many, for weeks at a time. And somehow, Verizon has been allowed to skate along without being held to the fire for it's mandated utility / carrier of last resort obligations.
I worry that Frontier, with all the new added debt obligations, will not able to swallow this pill.
Mike-
Current thread:
- Verizon exiting California Matthew Black (Jul 30)
- Re: Verizon exiting California Mike Hammett (Jul 30)
- RE: Verizon exiting California Matthew Black (Jul 30)
- Re: Verizon exiting California Colton Conor (Jul 30)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Robert Glover (Jul 30)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Colton Conor (Jul 31)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Mike Hammett (Jul 31)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Mike (Jul 31)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Christopher Morrow (Jul 31)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Mel Beckman (Jul 31)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Mike Hammett (Jul 31)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Colton Conor (Jul 31)