nanog mailing list archives

Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?


From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 20:30:37 +0200

On Friday, January 02, 2015 04:17:37 AM Ca By wrote:

Ymmv. I have feeling that running a bgp rr on cheap /
standard / commidity vm is pretty exotic from a support
perspective.

Not really.

Since July last year.

The worst I've had was the HP server shutting down in a 
London data centre due to environmental overheating.

Beyond that, similar requirements as with a router, if you 
avoid the VM clustering goodness they all preach.

So running a bgp rr on a vm may make sense in theory, but
my network control planes are not too busy and vm bgp is
a unique/ exotic support model.

Amongst very many other things, running an RR on my core 
router means I need to touch my core router code if I want 
that exotic routing feature.

I'd rather not, if my core router (in-path) is really just 
forwarding traffic between PoP's.

But agree, our networks are probably quite different :-).

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Current thread: