nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 20:24:48 +0200
On Friday, January 02, 2015 12:09:36 AM Nick Hilliard wrote:
there are patches for both code-bases and some preliminary support for vpnv4 in quagga, but other than that neither currently supports either ldp or the vpnv4/vpnv6 address families in the main-line code.
LDP support would not be necessary for an out-of-path RR, but lack of VPNv4/VPNv6 is hurdle. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?, (continued)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Nick Hilliard (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Jeff Tantsura (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mike Hammett (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Ca By (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Nick Hilliard (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Rob Shakir (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Jeff Tantsura (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Nick Hilliard (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 08)