nanog mailing list archives

Re: Checkpoint IPS


From: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 20:34:36 +0700


On 5 Feb 2015, at 19:57, Terry Baranski wrote:

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but everything we do is "artificial". There are no routers in nature, no IP packets, no fiber optics. There is no such thing as "natural engineering" -- engineering is "artificial" by definition.

This isn't even worthy of comment, so I won't.

But there's no overstating the usefulness of a properly-tuned IPS for attack prevention

I've never heard a plausible anecdote, much less seen meaningful statistics, of these devices actually 'preventing' anything.

I have, however, run into many, many situations in which these devices demonstrably degraded the security posture of network operators, particularly when placed in front of servers or broadband access networks. For example, they're laughably easy to DDoS due to state exhaustion - which is what is the main point of the presentation you reference.

And the fact that well-known evasion techniques still work against these devices today, coupled with the undeniable proliferation of compromised hosts residing within networks supposedly 'protected' by these devices, militates against your proposition.

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>


Current thread: