nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 09:21:25 +0200
On 25/Dec/15 14:14, Nick Hilliard wrote:
You mean, cut off Sweden, Ireland, Finland, Switzerland and Israel?
And watch the transit per-Mbps price go up? Who do we think funds the low bandwidth costs of the "first world"? Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Matthew Petach (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Damian Menscher via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake James Downs (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Jared Mauch (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Joel Jaeggli (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Max Tulyev (Dec 25)
- RE: Broadband Router Comparisons Keith Medcalf (Dec 24)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 26)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Larry Sheldon (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Stephen Satchell (Dec 27)