nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:40:36 -0800
While you have a great deal of control over what prefixes you choose to accept... You have very little control over your advertised prefixes once they exit your ASN. Maybe your transits offer communities to control their peer advertisements. In general assuming you're paying for the Internet cone, you have a vested interest in them propagating everywhere otherwise the party that is partitioned is you. Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 24, 2015, at 15:44, Colin Johnston <colinj () gt86car org uk> wrote: see http://map.norsecorp.com We really need to ask if China and Russia for that matter will not take abuse reports seriously why allow them to network to the internet ? Colin
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Matthew Petach (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Damian Menscher via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake James Downs (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Jared Mauch (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Joel Jaeggli (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Max Tulyev (Dec 25)
- RE: Broadband Router Comparisons Keith Medcalf (Dec 24)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 26)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Larry Sheldon (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Stephen Satchell (Dec 27)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Michael Thomas (Dec 27)