nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nat
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:18:58 -0500
I'm preparing some slides on this topic for an upcoming webinar our marketing team has roped me into :-) I'd love to hear from people on what they perceive and the real barriers they have seen with regards to IPv6 in your environment. I certainly have the list from our IT department. After much effort and under duress it seems they are making progress and 2016 will be the year it happens. Jared Mauch
On Dec 19, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Sander Steffann <sander () steffann nl> wrote: If the choice is between the IETF having to change standards vs some people having to learn something new then sorry, they will have to invest some time and learn.... IPv4 != IPv6. You have to keep learning, that's part of the job.
Current thread:
- Re: Nat, (continued)
- Re: Nat Mark Andrews (Dec 20)
- Re: Nat Lee Howard (Dec 18)
- Re: Nat Randy Bush (Dec 17)
- Re: Nat Lee Howard (Dec 18)
- Re: Nat Matthew Newton (Dec 18)
- Re: Nat Sander Steffann (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Jeff McAdams (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Sander Steffann (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Sander Steffann (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Jared Mauch (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Matthew Petach (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Sander Steffann (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Baldur Norddahl (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Matthew Newton (Dec 21)
- Re: Nat A . L . M . Buxey (Dec 21)
- Re: Nat Matthew Petach (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat James R Cutler (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Message not available
- Re: Nat Lee Howard (Dec 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Nat Larry Sheldon (Dec 16)