nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nat
From: Lee Howard <Lee () asgard org>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:21:28 -0500
On 12/16/15, 8:53 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Berry Mobley" <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of berry () gadsdenst org> wrote:
At 08:22 PM 12/16/2015, Randy Bush wrote:We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.this is the oppress the workers so they will revolt theory. load of crap. make ipv6 easier to deploy, especially in enterprise. repeat the previous sentence 42 times.This. I'm in an enterprise with some stubborn vendors, and none of them are even talking about ipv6. It won't help me to move (and it won't help you to get well if you're here) if my users can't get to their stuff.
Can you dual-stack while you wait for them? Can we help you push on those vendors? Lee
Berry
Current thread:
- Re: Nat, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Nat Lee Howard (Dec 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Nat Larry Sheldon (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Randy Bush (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Bjørn Mork (Dec 22)