![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:54:21 +0200
On 18/Aug/15 18:02, Tim Durack wrote:
Can I ask why you terminate peering and transit on different routers? (Not suggesting that is bad, just trying to understand the reason.)
Easier policy enforcement for us. Lowers the chance of you dealing with traffic in ways you don't intend (although that can always be fixed). Spreading both commercial and technical risk, depending on whether you value transit more than peering, or vice versa. Avoiding kinky things with VRF's. Mark.
Current thread:
- Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Jared Mauch (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits manning (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Jared Mauch (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Fwd: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Nick Hilliard (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Nick Hilliard (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits William Herrin (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Nick Hilliard (Aug 19)