Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions

["marcel.duregards () yahoo fr" <marcel.duregards () yahoo fr>]

you can try to get some financials (probably poor technical) view on DDOS :
http://www.infonetics.com/pr/2014/1H14-DDoS-Prevention-Appliances-Market-Highlights.asp


The DDOS prevention Appliances report is not free, and I doubt it's 
really technical :-)
But at least you could know what your financial guys might think. Could 
help you if you want to convince them to buy Arbor :-).

- Marcel


On 12.08.2015 16:28, Ramy Hashish wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200
> > From: "marcel.duregards () yahoo fr" <marcel.duregards () yahoo fr>
> > To: nanog () nanog org
> > Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
> > Message-ID: <55C992DE.3020906 () yahoo fr>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> >
> > anybody from this impressive list ?:
> >
> > https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
> >
> > -- Marcel
> Anybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in the
> market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)?
>
> Another question, have anybody from the reviewers tested the false
> positives of the box, or experienced any false positive incidents?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ramy