nanog mailing list archives
Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
From: Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1 () mac com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:42:37 +0200
Hello My 2 cents You can use Wanguard for the detection and A10 for the mitigation, you have just to play with the API. Regards Fabien
Le 12 août 2015 à 16:28, Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish () gmail com> a écrit :Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200 From: "marcel.duregards () yahoo fr" <marcel.duregards () yahoo fr> To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Message-ID: <55C992DE.3020906 () yahoo fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed anybody from this impressive list ?: https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers -- MarcelAnybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in the market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)? Another question, have anybody from the reviewers tested the false positives of the box, or experienced any false positive incidents? Thanks, Ramy
Current thread:
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions, (continued)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Paul Ferguson (Aug 10)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Nick Pratley (Aug 10)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Aug 10)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Nick Rose (Aug 11)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Aaron (Aug 11)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Matt Taylor (Aug 11)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Aug 11)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Fabien Delmotte (Aug 12)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Ramy Hashish (Aug 12)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Aug 15)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Ramy Hashish (Aug 26)