nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering and Network Cost
From: Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz () Janoszka pl>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:12:18 +0200
On 2015-04-15 19:50, Max Tulyev wrote:
transit cost is lowering close to peering cost, so it is doubghtful economy on small channels. If you don't live in Amsterdam/Frankfurt/London - add the DWDM cost from you to one of major IX. That's the magic. In large scale peering is still efficient. It is efficient on local traffic which is often huge.
Even in the three cities you mentioned peering on small scale is usually not cheaper at all or only very little.
Please keep in mind that some companies peer despite it offers no savings for them and at the end of the day it might be even more expensive. They do it because of performance and reliability reasons.
-- Grzegorz Janoszka
Current thread:
- Peering and Network Cost Rod Beck (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 15)
- RE: Peering and Network Cost Siegel, David (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Baldur Norddahl (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost William Waites (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Jason Lixfeld (Apr 19)