nanog mailing list archives

Peering and Network Cost


From: Rod Beck <Rod.Beck () hibernianetworks com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:28:34 +0000

Hi,


As you all know, transit costs in the wholesale market today a few percent of what it did in 2000. I assume that most 
of that decline is due to a modified version of Moore's Law (I don't believe optics costs decline 50% every 18 months) 
and the advent of maverick players like Cogent that broker cozy oligopoly pricing.


But I also wondering whether the advent of widespread peering (promiscuous?) among the Tier 2 players (buy transit and 
peer) has played a role. In 2000 peering was still an exclusive club and in contrast today Tier 2 players often have 
hundreds of peers. Peering should reduce costs and also demand in the wholesale IP market. Supply increases and demand 
falls.


I thank you in advance for any insights.


Regards,


- R.


Roderick Beck
Sales Director/Europe and the Americas
Hibernia Networks

This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may be 
proprietary and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, without the prior written 
permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately telephone or 
e-mail the sender and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of this e-mail, and any printout thereof. All 
documents, contracts or agreements referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. The contents of an 
attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses that could damage your own computer system. While Hibernia 
Networks has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage that 
you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.


Current thread: