nanog mailing list archives
Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT]
From: George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:16:33 -0700
On Oct 21, 2014, at 6:03 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote: GNOME is probably the linchpin. But it's not just RH. It's Debian, and by extension *buntu, and SuSE, and at least one other major independent parent distro that I can't think of just now... And as far as I know, it's done; SuSE packages already largely don't even include initscripts.
Enough to make a grown man fork RHEL (or, CentOS). George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone
Current thread:
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT], (continued)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Simon Lyall (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] George Herbert (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Jeffrey Ollie (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] joel jaeggli (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] nanog (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Barry Shein (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Miles Fidelman (Oct 21)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Ricky Beam (Oct 21)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Jay Ashworth (Oct 21)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] George Herbert (Oct 21)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Miles Fidelman (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Tom Hill (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] nanog (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Elmar K. Bins (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Daniel Ankers (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Matt Palmer (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] nanog (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Barry Shein (Oct 22)