nanog mailing list archives
Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT]
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:56:27 -0400
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:29:44 -0400, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:
The thing that I don't understand about systemd is how it managed to get *EVERY SINGLE DISTRIBUTION'S RELEASE MANAGER* on board...
It's spelled "Red Hat". Add in GNOME and debian (et. al.) is backed into a corner. Red Hat is soo f'ing big, pretty much every project under the sun is going to stop maintaining scripts in favor of systemd.
Current thread:
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT], (continued)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Jim Mercer (Oct 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Larry Sheldon (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Simon Lyall (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] George Herbert (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Jeffrey Ollie (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] joel jaeggli (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] nanog (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Barry Shein (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Miles Fidelman (Oct 21)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Ricky Beam (Oct 21)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Jay Ashworth (Oct 21)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] George Herbert (Oct 21)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Miles Fidelman (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Tom Hill (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] nanog (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Elmar K. Bins (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Daniel Ankers (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Matt Palmer (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] nanog (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Barry Shein (Oct 22)