Re: large BCP38 compliance testing

[Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp () alvarezp ods org>]

On 05/10/14 18:44, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
> > The *real* problem isn't the testing.
> > It's the assumption that you can actually *do* anything useful with this data.
> > Name-n-shame probably won't get us far - and the way the US works, if there's a
>
> At least "name and shame"  is something more useful than nothing done.

Has it worked for the deaggregation offenders named by the CIDR report?