nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies?
From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 08:20:37 -0500 (CDT)
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net> wrote:But to make a long story short, and my memory's perhaps a bit rusty now, but my recollection is that shorter URL's looked nicer and there was significant money to be had running the registry, so there was some heavy lobbying against retiring .GOV in favor of .FED.US (and other .US locality domains).[snip] The same problem exists with .EDU capriciously adopting new criteria that excludes any non-US-based institutions from being eligible. I believe the major issue is that if a TLD is in the global namespace, then it should NOT be allowed to restrict registrations based on country; the internet is global and .GOV and .EDU are in Global Namespace. So then, why aren't .EDU and .GOV just allowed to continue to exist but a community decision made to require whichever registry will be contracted to manage .GOV to accept registrations from _all_ government entities regardless of nationality ?
Because the US has historically held control over the whole process. Regardless of what it may seem like, it's not a community process.
In otherwords, rejection of the idea that a registry operating GTLD namespace can be allowed to impose overly exclusive "eligibility criteria"
In the specific case of ".gov", I'd say that there's some danger to having multiple nations operating in that single 2LD space; .gov should probably be retired and federal institutions migrated to .fed.us. There's also namespace available for localities. But given the choice between rationality and insanity, usually the process seems to prefer insanity. ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
Current thread:
- Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Matthew Petach (Oct 19)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? sthaug (Oct 19)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Joe Greco (Oct 19)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Jimmy Hess (Oct 19)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Joe Greco (Oct 19)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Stephen Satchell (Oct 19)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Mike. (Oct 19)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? shawn wilson (Oct 20)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 20)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? shawn wilson (Oct 20)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 20)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? shawn wilson (Oct 20)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Barry Shein (Oct 20)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? David Conrad (Oct 21)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Doug Barton (Oct 21)
- Re: Why is .gov only for US government agencies? Jimmy Hess (Oct 19)