Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out

[William Herrin <bill () herrin us>]

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Richard Hicks <richard.hicks () gmail com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:40 AM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
> > "Regardless of the number of hosts on an individual LAN or WAN
> > segment, every multi-access network (non-point-to-point) requires at
> > least one /64 prefix."
> >
> > But using /64s on WAN links invites needless problems with neighbor
> > discovery when an attacker decides to send one ping each to half a
> > million adresses all of which happen to land on that WAN link.
>
> The BCOP specfically addresses this in 4b:
> " b. Point-to-point links should be allocated a /64 and configured with a
> /126 or /127"

It says, effectively, that a WAN link involving 3 or 4 routers (a
common redundancy design) should use a /64. I think that's nuts. It
creates a needlessly wide attack surface. Use a /124 for that.

And if our subnets should be on nibble boundaries, /126 and /127 on
ptp links aren't so wise either. Use a /124 for that too.

-Bill



-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
May I solve your unusual networking challenges?