nanog mailing list archives
Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission...
From: Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon () cox net>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:24:55 -0600
On 11/29/2014 14:09, John Levine wrote:
In article <CAL9jLaY1q_RBkyB6kczKZUiFR5b1r3kuVz8WivWR0Rjj_oaGTg () mail gmail com> you write:backing up a bit in the conversation, perhaps this is just in some regions of comcastlandia? I don't see this in Northern Virginia...I don't see it in New Jersey, either. Is this a direct connection, or a coffee shop sharing a cable connection or something like that?
I am a little confused but have note yet had time and interest at the same time to back through the thread....
I thought when it started that the complaint was somebody using a public wiffy had been victimized by something I read about recently (and thought it was here that I had red it) where somebody sets up a fraudulent server on the wiffy that advertises a false-flag email "server" that strips out the security stuff and then sends the traffic to an accomplice-site that eventually gets the stripped traffic to its original destination.
-- The unique Characteristics of System Administrators: The fact that they are infallible; and, The fact that they learn from their mistakes. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
Current thread:
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission..., (continued)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 29)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... Christopher Morrow (Nov 29)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... John Levine (Nov 29)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... Christopher Morrow (Nov 29)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... joel jaeggli (Nov 29)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... Christopher Morrow (Nov 29)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... William Herrin (Nov 30)
- Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission... Randy Bush (Nov 29)