nanog mailing list archives

Re: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]


From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 09:34:01 +0200

On Monday, May 05, 2014 09:27:37 AM Vitkovský Adam wrote:

You mean the SR right?

No, I mean:

        draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-05

The draft looks at issues that need to be fixed for MPLS to 
run in a single-stack IPv6 network.

Of course, there is other work that is looking at fixing 
LDPv6 as well, as you know.

At the recent MPLS SDN Congress in Paris, I asked some folk 
about leveraging SR to push native IPv6 support into MPLS, 
but they didn't seem like that was a key application yet. So 
while SR is promising, I think it's not a solution for this 
particular use-case yet.

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Current thread: