nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT IP and Google
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 19:01:42 -0400
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:21:12 +1200, "Tony Wicks" said:
Deploy v6... yes its very easy to replace every CPE device that every home user has... really ? come on, back in the real world that is just not going to happen until by default every CPE device has the capability as default. Dual stack with CGNAT is the only real solution that works today.
And if 5 years ago you had *started* distributing CPE that did v6, and by now you had 40% of your customer with CPE that did it, you'd need a 40% smaller CGN to fix your Google problem..
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- NAT IP and Google Pui Edylie (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Harald Koch (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Harald Koch (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Mark Andrews (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Owen DeLong (May 21)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Ca By (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Ca By (May 21)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 21)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Livingood, Jason (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Sholes, Joshua (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) manning (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Michael Brown (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Martin Hannigan (May 22)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 21)