nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT IP and Google
From: William Waites <ww () styx org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 18:45:44 +0000
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Harald Koch wrote:
Might help if all your hosts have their own IPv6 addresses
That was meant to be implied... But... On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:10:56AM -0600, Derek Andrew wrote:
They take out our campus, both IPv4 and IPv6.
That's interesting, I haven't seen this happen with IPv6. Some of the networks I work with do the "everything behind NAT" thing and get bitten by this. Using a pool of addresses helps but... This is only going to get more painful with more people doing "Carrier Grade" NAT... -w
Current thread:
- NAT IP and Google Pui Edylie (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Harald Koch (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Harald Koch (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Mark Andrews (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Owen DeLong (May 21)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Ca By (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Ca By (May 21)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 21)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Livingood, Jason (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 22)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 21)