nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH ONTs and routers
From: Jean-Francois Mezei <jfmezei_nanog () vaxination ca>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 13:43:08 -0400
Many thanks for the answers so far. On 14-05-15 13:35, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
The assertion that ONTs have built-in routing capabilities has been challenged.By who?
A rather large company in Canada whose name contains the last name of the inventor of the Telephone :-) (actually from their Atlantic Canada arm). I know that Bell Canada's FTTH deployment includes a Sagemcom VDSL modem after the ONT. It uses it as plain router in FTTH because it supports twin VLANs (one for internet and other for IPTV) and I guess they figured it would be easier to standarize on a single router across its DSL and FTTH footprint. Not sure what Bell Aliant uses. My argument had been that in a wholesale context, the Sagemcom must not be included when wholesale service since it is not necessary.
Current thread:
- FTTH ONTs and routers Jean-Francois Mezei (May 15)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Jared Mauch (May 15)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Scott Helms (May 15)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Aled Morris (May 15)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Shawn L (May 15)
- RE: FTTH ONTs and routers Frank Bulk (May 15)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Mark Tinka (May 16)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Jay Ashworth (May 16)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Shawn L (May 15)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Clayton Zekelman (May 15)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Jean-Francois Mezei (May 15)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Mikael Abrahamsson (May 15)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Mark Tinka (May 16)
- Re: FTTH ONTs and routers Pete@TCC (May 16)
- RE: FTTH ONTs and routers Frank Bulk (May 17)
- RE: FTTH ONTs and routers Kevin Burke (May 21)
- RE: FTTH ONTs and routers Frank Bulk (May 17)