nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Security [Was: Re: misunderstanding scale]


From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:14:30 -0500

On 3/27/2014 12:19 PM, Luke S. Crawford wrote:

This is a very common problem for dedicated hosting providers (and why I give my dedicated hosts a vlan and a routed subnet, wasting IPv4.)

Implement what some DSL access providers do. Unnumbered interfaces with /32 routing to the vlan. The last I checked, I think a J can even get the /32 route from radius when using autoconfig with radius auth. We did similar things with IPv6, as well. proxy-arp/proxy-nd to handle the cross talk.

IOS 12.1 7206 confirmed. No autoconf, but static subinterfaces for each vlan (q-in-q supported or atm), unnumbered to loopback. DHCPv4 and static routing works. IPv6 had issues, but could handle static /64 per subint.

ASR/J MX, autoconfig w/ radius backend, manual subint/unit, or combination. DHCPv4 confirmed, static host routes confirmed. IPv6 not confirmed. Radius static host route establishment not confirmed. Still testing.



Jack


Current thread: