nanog mailing list archives
Re: misunderstanding scale
From: Mike Hale <eyeronic.design () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 17:24:24 -0700
"I wasn't aware that calling out FUD was derisive, but whatever." It's derisive because you completely dismiss a huge security issue that, given the state of IPv6 adoption, a great majority of companies are facing. Calling it FUD is completely wrong because it *is* a legitimate security issue for most businesses. Sure, you've got the few who have been able to properly plan for and secure their networks against the increased attack surface of IPv6, but again...most companies haven't. Slinging false proclamations of FUD is as harmful as FUD itself. On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Timothy Morizot <tmorizot () gmail com> wrote:
On Mar 23, 2014 6:21 PM, "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawgster () mykolab com> wrote:Says you.And many others. My comments were actually reiterating what I commonly see presented today.On the other hand, there are beaucoup enterprise networks unwilling to consider to moving to v6 until there are management, control, administrative, and security issues addressed.Whereas there are other enterprise networks, including mine, who are actively deploying IPv6 and have been for a number of years now. So unless you can come up with something truly novel that we haven't already dealt with, I'll stick by my use of FUD.You can continue to deride our issues, and make derisive comments until your heart's content, but it does not change reality.I wasn't aware that calling out FUD was derisive, but whatever. Cheers, Scott
-- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Security, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Security Owen DeLong (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 Security [Was: Re: misunderstanding scale] Owen DeLong (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 Security [Was: Re: misunderstanding scale] Luke S. Crawford (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 Security [Was: Re: misunderstanding scale] Jack Bates (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 Security [Was: Re: misunderstanding scale] Owen DeLong (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 Security [Was: Re: misunderstanding scale] Luke S. Crawford (Mar 27)
- Re: misunderstanding scale bmanning (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Timothy Morizot (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Paul Ferguson (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Timothy Morizot (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mike Hale (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Timothy Morizot (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mike Hale (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Timothy Morizot (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Timothy Morizot (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mike Hale (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Timothy Morizot (Mar 23)
- RE: misunderstanding scale Naslund, Steve (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale William Herrin (Mar 24)
- RE: misunderstanding scale Alexander Lopez (Mar 24)