nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP
From: Andrew Sullivan <asullivan () dyn com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:38:14 -0400
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:05:52AM -0400, rwebb () ropeguru com wrote:
most cases, would that not make things easier? So those that want to run email servers SHOULD be on ISP's that allow for rDNS configuration for IPv6.
Several years ago now the IETF DNSOP WG worked on a document about reverse mapping. The topic was so controversial that the final version of the document, which said little more than, "There is a reverse tree, and you might want to take that into consideration. Or not. It's up to you," still couldn't get consensus. I think anything that involves making rules about others' reverse maps is probably an excellent way to attract ducks to nibble you to death. A -- Andrew Sullivan Dyn, Inc. asullivan () dyn com v: +1 603 663 0448
Current thread:
- IPv6 isn't SMTP Cutler James R (Mar 25)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Paul S. (Mar 25)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP John Levine (Mar 25)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Daniel Taylor (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP rwebb () ropeguru com (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Andrew Sullivan (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Daniel Taylor (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Blake Hudson (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Jimmy Hess (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Blake Hudson (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Barry Shein (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Blake Hudson (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Barry Shein (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Blake Hudson (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Daniel Taylor (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Clay Fiske (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Blake Hudson (Mar 28)