nanog mailing list archives
Re: A little silly for IPv6
From: "rwebb () ropeguru com" <rwebb () ropeguru com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:19:14 -0400
I would support THIS as a better reference than some of the other email responses I have gotten.
Again comparing something like factual numbers of IPv6 addresses the the very fuzzy math of guessing how many atoms there are is very silly indeed.
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:06:15 +0000 Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster () gmail com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:55 PM, rwebb () ropeguru com <rwebb () ropeguru com> wrote:.....I want to see HIS source of hpow many atoms are actually on the earth. Somehow, I do not think anyone knows that answer. So his comparision is ajoke.Obligatory xkcd ref: https://xkcd.com/865/
Current thread:
- A little silly for IPv6 Larry Sheldon (Mar 25)
- Re: A little silly for IPv6 Jeff Kell (Mar 25)
- Re: A little silly for IPv6 rwebb () ropeguru com (Mar 26)
- Re: A little silly for IPv6 Gary Buhrmaster (Mar 26)
- Re: A little silly for IPv6 rwebb () ropeguru com (Mar 26)
- Re: A little silly for IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 26)
- Re: A little silly for IPv6 Justin M. Streiner (Mar 26)
- Re: A little silly for IPv6 Gary Buhrmaster (Mar 26)
- Re: A little silly for IPv6 Paul S. (Mar 26)