nanog mailing list archives

RE: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition


From: MailPlus| David Hofstee <david () mailplus nl>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:17:17 +0100

Lacking reverse should be one of many things to consider with rejecting e-mails, but should not be the only condition.
And your opinion is just another one. Someone else has a different one. Resulting in the mess email is now. You won't 
believe the crap I read in bounces (it also gives a funny insight into the email chain/setup of a company).

Email security (against spam) should be fixed. Properly. Fine grained complaining should be possible (to the sender and 
all intermittent parties, as well as external parties). 

Make some RFCs that work please.


David Hofstee

Deliverability Management
MailPlus B.V. Netherlands (ESP)


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Brielle Bruns [mailto:bruns () 2mbit com] 
Verzonden: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:57 PM
Aan: nanog () nanog org
Onderwerp: Re: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition

On 3/25/14, 11:56 AM, John Levine wrote:
I think this would be a good time to fix your mail server setup.
You're never going to get much v6 mail delivered without rDNS, because 
receivers won't even look at your mail to see if it's authenticated.

CenturyLink is reasonably technically clued so it shouldn't be 
impossible to get them to fix it.


Nothing wrong with my mail server setup, except the lack of RDNS. 
Lacking reverse should be one of many things to consider with rejecting e-mails, but should not be the only condition.

That would be like outright refusing mail unless it had both SPF and DKIM on every single message.

Sure, great in theory, does not work in reality and will result in lost mail from legit sources.

Already spoken to CenturyLink about RDNS for ipv6 - won't have rdns until native IPv6.  Currently, IPv6 seems to be 
delivered for those who want it, via 6rd.

And, frankly, I'm not going to get in a fight with CenturyLink over IPv6 RDNS, considering that I am thankful that they 
are even offering IPv6 when other large providers aren't even trying to do so to their residential and small business 
customers.

It is very easy for some to forget that not everyone has a gigabit fiber connection to their homes with ARIN assigned 
IPv4/IPv6 blocks announced over BGP.  Some of us actually have to make do with (sometimes very) limited budgets and 
what the market is offering us and has made available.


--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org    /     http://www.ahbl.org


Current thread: