nanog mailing list archives
Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R
From: Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:00:28 -0400
Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu> writes:
Actually, there is no NEC 384.16 any more, at least in the 2011 code.
Guilty. I reflexively reached for my 2008 copy since that's the code of record here where I live. Glad we're not on 2011, wish we were still on 2005; a lot of stupidity has crept in since then. Tamper-resistant receptacles required in the unfinished basement shop? *really*? -r
Current thread:
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R, (continued)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Jay Ashworth (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Randy (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Jeremy Bresley (Mar 18)
- RE: L6-20P -> L6-30R Staudinger, Malcolm (Mar 19)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Joel Maslak (Mar 19)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Jay Ashworth (Mar 19)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Seth Mattinen (Mar 19)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Jay Ashworth (Mar 19)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Rob Seastrom (Mar 19)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Lamar Owen (Mar 20)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Rob Seastrom (Mar 20)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Gary Buhrmaster (Mar 20)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Lamar Owen (Mar 20)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Jay Ashworth (Mar 18)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Gary Buhrmaster (Mar 20)
- Re: L6-20P -> L6-30R Brandon Galbraith (Mar 20)