nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:04:09 -0700
On Jun 22, 2014, at 20:41 , Laszlo Hanyecz <laszlo () heliacal net> wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 3:32 AM, "Kalnozols, Andris" <andris () hpl hp com> wrote:On 6/22/2014 7:41 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:Did they ever explain why? Did the SMC function as a router, and act as the customer side of a stub network that allowed that /29 to hang off the router? If that was the case, and the Motorola D3 modem was L2-only, that might explain the change in capability.The Comcast business SMC gateway speaks RIP to make the routed /29 work.. in theory it could be put into bridge mode and you can do the RIP yourself but they don't support that configuration (you'd need the key to configure it successfully and they didn't want to do when I asked). If you poke around in the web UI, it does support IPv6 in some form, but it doesn't seem to be active for me. If you don't have a static IP block from them and thus don't have the need to use RIP you can just use a regular DOCSIS 3 cable modem and get IPv6, but you only get one IPv4 number that way.
In my experience, if you put a switch behind the modem (not a router), you can get as many IPv4 numbers as you have devices attached to the switch on Business Class. On residential, you're limited to one, but I have gotten multiples on business class. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion, (continued)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion TJ (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Darren Pilgrim (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Darren Pilgrim (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Darren Pilgrim (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Kalnozols, Andris (Jun 22)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Frank Bulk (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Kalnozols, Andris (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Laszlo Hanyecz (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Jimmy Hess (Jun 23)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Frank Bulk (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Barry Shein (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Barry Shein (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Barry Shein (Jun 19)