nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:41:24 -0700
This looks somewhat promising: http://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/R7000/R7000_DS_vA_19Mar14.pdf ~$200 If you want something cheaper, this: http://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/R6300V2/R6300v2_DS_20Jun13.pdf is about $100. I haven’t tried either of these myself yet, but other Netgear home products with IPv6 support have worked reasonably well in my experience and these are newer generation and do list IPv6 support in their data sheets. There may be cheaper models. I haven’t done any sort of thorough investigation. Of course the Apple Airport Express and Airport Extreme models also have 802.11ac support and known good IPv6 implementations. Owen On Jun 21, 2014, at 2:49 PM, Frank Bulk <frnkblk () iname com> wrote:
I'm looking for a new consumer router to offer our customers that has GigE ports and supports IEEE 802.11ac, and all the products that our reseller and their partners have suggested don't have IPv6 Ready certification or the vendor can't confirm they meet RIPE's 554 document. D-Link has a long list of approved products, but I chose to stop using their products for other reasons. If any can recommend a mid-range consumer router that you think would meet our needs, please drop me a note off-list. Frank -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Gary Buhrmaster Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 9:41 PM To: Owen DeLong Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote: .....Ideally, it would be nice if the UNH/IOL and/or CEA could come up with a meaningful definition of IPv6 support and a logo to go with it that we could tell consumers to look for on the box. Ideally, this would be a set of standards that users of the logo agree to abide by rather than a fee-based testing regime that excludes smaller players.You mean something like the IPv6 Ready logo at http://www.ipv6ready.org ?
Current thread:
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion, (continued)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Brian Hartsfield (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Ricky Beam (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion John Curran (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Message not available
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Larry Sheldon (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Matt Palmer (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Gary Buhrmaster (Jun 19)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Frank Bulk (Jun 21)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Mark Andrews (Jun 18)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Edward Arthurs (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Justin M. Streiner (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Edward Arthurs (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Edward Arthurs (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)