RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)

[Jean-Francois.Dube () videotron com]

There are obviously layer 8-9-10 issues to deal with as well before native 
IPv6 can be deployed.

Being a IP NOC grunt, I keep my focus on layer 1-7.


JF

Jean-François Dubé
Technicien, Opérations Réseau IP
Ingénierie Exploitation des Réseaux
Vidéotron

"NANOG" <nanog-bounces () nanog org> a écrit sur 2014-06-20 10:22:17 :

> De : Gabriel Blanchard <gabe () teksavvy ca>
> A : "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org>, 
> Date : 2014-06-20 10:24
> Objet : RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)
> Envoyé par : "NANOG" <nanog-bounces () nanog org>
>
> 6rd is in my opinion a band-aid solution, I don't see the point of 
> offering IPv6 if it requires IPv4. native IPv6 should be offered 
> where possible.
>
> We offer native IPv6 to all our DSL customers but only on an opt-in 
> basis, we're although unfortunately unable to offer IPv6 over Cable 
> since we still depend on a certain incumbent...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Jean-
> Francois.Dube () videotron com
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 10:13 AM
> To: lists () sadiqs com
> Cc: nanog () nanog org; NANOG
> Subject: RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)
>
> Videotron (AS5769) is offering 6RD (RFC5969) to all residential 
> customers, if their gear supports it. (DHCP option 212)
>
> (But our MGMT still calls it beta for now.)
>
> JF
>
> Jean-François Dubé
> Technicien, Opérations Réseau IP
> Ingénierie Exploitation des Réseaux
> Vidéotron
>
> "NANOG" <nanog-bounces () nanog org> a écrit sur 2014-06-18 20:16:01 :
>
> > De : Sadiq Saif <lists () sadiqs com>
> > A : nanog () nanog org,
> > Date : 2014-06-19 12:43
> > Objet : Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) Envoyé 
> > par : "NANOG" <nanog-bounces () nanog org>
> >
> > On 6/18/2014 14:25, Lee Howard wrote:
> > > Canada is way behind, just 0.4% deployment.
> >
> > Any Canadian ISP folk in here want to shine a light on this dearth of 
> > residential IPv6 connectivity?
> >
> > Is there any progress being made on this front?
> >
> > --
> > Sadiq Saif