nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:00:47 -0400
On Jun 17, 2014, at 8:46 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
One could make a valid argument that this is no worse than systems with misconfigured IPv4 who cannot reach Google at all even if they don't publish AAAA records because their IPv4 is so badly misconfigured that it doesn't work either. I suspect it may well be approximately the same fraction of systems, though it may take longer to notice/resolve the IPv6 issues than the IPv4 ones.
At the last RIPE i had some troubles with my IPv4 while my IPv6 worked fine. Folks internally grumbled about fixing IPv6 hosts because those with IPv6 are in the minority, but that is a diminishing view and honestly people who keep repeating that will slowly undercut themselves out of relevance. - jared
Current thread:
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion, (continued)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Jay Ashworth (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Mark Andrews (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Jared Mauch (Jun 17)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Frank Bulk (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 19)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Matthew Huff (Jun 19)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Frank Bulk (Jun 21)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion George, Wes (Jun 22)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Frank Bulk (Jun 22)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Jared Mauch (Jun 17)