nanog mailing list archives
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
From: joshua rayburn <jbrayburn () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:45:56 -0400
You can utilize an ASR 1006 / 1013 with an ESP card for CGN functionality. Starting in 3.10 code you can utilize Bulk Port Allocation to carve out small consecutive port bundles for end users as to not mess up SIP functionsand High Speed Logging to log individual customers ports for law enforcement needs without overrunning your logging server. On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com> wrote:
We are looking for recommendations for a carrier grade nat solution. Who is the leaders in this space? How do carrier grade NAT platforms integrate with DHCP and DNS solutions? How do you keep track of copyright violations in a CGNAT solution if multiple customers are sharing the same public IP address?
Current thread:
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT, (continued)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Doug Barton (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Gary Buhrmaster (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Ca By (Jul 30)