nanog mailing list archives
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:56:40 +1000
In message <CAMfXtQwmpEqBk9CKRq2MpW15tRcuicZ_3DoJUsTBAM4=50319A () mail gmail com>, Gary Buhrmaster writes:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:On Jul 29, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:.....Add to that over half your traffic will switch to IPv6 as long as the customer has a IPv6 capable CPE. That's a lot less logging you need to do from day 1.That would be nice, but Iâm not 100% convinced that it is true.For the 99.99% of the users who believe that facebook and twitter *are* the internet, at least facebook is IPv6 enabled. 50.00%(*)! Yes, I think we can all stipulate that those participating on this list are different, and have different expectations, and different capabilities, than those other 99.99%. Gary (*) If we are going to make up statistics, four significant digits looks better than one.
Enable IPv6 at home and measure the traffic. I did, which is why I say > 50%. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT, (continued)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT TJ (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Fred Baker (fred) (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Fred Baker (fred) (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Doug Barton (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Gary Buhrmaster (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Ca By (Jul 30)