nanog mailing list archives
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:57:54 -0700
On Jul 29, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Chris Boyd <cboyd () gizmopartners com> wrote:
On Jul 29, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:If law enforcement comes along without port numbers then you give them a list of subscribers behind that IP at the time. Use port block allocation and keep track of the blocks to reduce logging load.There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that practice. As an ISP customer, I'd be furious to find out that my communications had been intercepted due to the bad behavior of another user. --Chris
As an ISP customer, would you really accept not being supplied a globally unique address? Really? I would not. Owen
Current thread:
- Carrier Grade NAT Colton Conor (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Daniel Corbe (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Colton Conor (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Daniel Corbe (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Colton Conor (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Chris Boyd (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Chris Boyd (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Chris Boyd (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Livingood, Jason (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT John Levine (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT William Herrin (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Daniel Corbe (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Robert Drake (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Simon Perreault (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Lee Howard (Jul 29)