nanog mailing list archives
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:33:08 -0700
On 7/23/14 5:30 AM, Scott Helms wrote:
The people involved in the bond arrangements almost invariably see having the city the layer 3 provider as more reliable path to getting repaid than an open system.
I assumed this was true, that bonds with the revenue stream based upon rights-of-way lease only, or row+dark-fiber, or ... were each incrementally easier to sell, having incrementally larger per-customer revenue shares.
If anyone has specific bonds, or bonding experiences they can point to I'd appreciate the pointers.
TiA, Eric
Current thread:
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics, (continued)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Steven Saner (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Miles Fidelman (Jul 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Larry Sheldon (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics John Osmon (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 23)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Steven Saner (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Ray Soucy (Jul 22)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Jul 22)