nanog mailing list archives

Re: Netflix To Cogent To World


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:24:25 -0400

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:
If I were Netflix, why would I buy all my transit from Cogent[1], given
Cogent's propensity for getting into peering fights with people *already*,
even before *I* start sending them 1000:1 asymmetric outbound traffic?

Did they not buy from Level 3 as well?


So why would Cogent offer Netflix a helluva deal?

Because that's the business Cogent is in? Underprice everybody but the
buyer gets what he gets without any real recourse if it isn't good
enough. Good money as a bottom feeder as long as you don't make the
mistake of selling a dollar for fifty cents.


On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Brandon Butterworth
<brandon () rd bbc co uk> wrote:
Previous events have shown Cognet only use live rounds, so why would they
not take the opportunity to get a bigger gun?

Just so.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?


Current thread: