nanog mailing list archives
Re: Net Neutrality...
From: Brett Glass <nanog () brettglass com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:48:19 -0600
At 02:16 PM 7/15/2014, Joly MacFie wrote:
And, in my experience, one needs around double or more of the listed bandwidth for a robust streaming connection.
This is only true if the connection is of poor quality and dropped packets lead to regular 50% cuts in the data rate. Most users (and the FCC!) do not understand that, due to the Van Jacobson AIMD algorithm, quality matters far more than quantity when a service is delivered via TCP. --Brett Glass
Current thread:
- Re: Net Neutrality..., (continued)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Bob Evans (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Brett Glass (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Bob Evans (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Fletcher Kittredge (Jul 16)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Bob Evans (Jul 16)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Keefe John (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Scott Helms (Jul 16)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Miles Fidelman (Jul 16)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Harlan Stenn (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Joly MacFie (Jul 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Net Neutrality... Brett Glass (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Jay Ashworth (Jul 15)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Graham Donaldson (Jul 16)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Barry Shein (Jul 16)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 17)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Michael Thomas (Jul 17)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Rob Seastrom (Jul 18)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Michael Thomas (Jul 18)
- Re: Net Neutrality... William Herrin (Jul 18)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Paul S. (Jul 18)
- Re: Net Neutrality... Gary Buhrmaster (Jul 18)