nanog mailing list archives
Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:51:40 -0500
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 08:58:12 +0100, sthaug () nethelp no said:
Some of the other claims (e.g. more secure because IPsec is always available) are simply wrong - there is plenty of IPv6 equipment that doesn't offer IPsec.
Given the incredible market penetration of IPsec on the v4 side of the fence, I guess we've found the true reason people aren't moving to IPv6. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency, (continued)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Nick Hilliard (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Saku Ytti (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency joel jaeggli (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Saku Ytti (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mark Tinka (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mukom Akong T. (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mark Tinka (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mukom Akong T. (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency sthaug (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Jimmy Hess (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 19)
- RE: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency John van Oppen (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency joel jaeggli (Jan 18)
- RE: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency John van Oppen (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Saku Ytti (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mark Tinka (Jan 19)