nanog mailing list archives
RE: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
From: John van Oppen <jvanoppen () spectrumnet us>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:10:02 +0000
We ended up with 6PE to make the v6 support on our cisco based network behave the same way as v4, IE use TE tunnels, etc. Given the v4 MPLS this was the only real way to make it the same. -----Original Message----- From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joelja () bogus com] Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 10:56 AM To: John van Oppen; 'mark.tinka () seacom mu'; nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency On 1/18/14, 10:30 AM, John van Oppen wrote:
This is exactly what pushed us into 6PE... it was the only way to make performance similar to v4 from a routing standpoint.
This statement is a bit facile... What platform are you referring to?
John @ AS11404
Current thread:
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency, (continued)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mark Tinka (Jan 19)
- Message not available
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mukom Akong T. (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mark Tinka (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mukom Akong T. (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency sthaug (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Jimmy Hess (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 19)
- RE: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency John van Oppen (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency joel jaeggli (Jan 18)
- RE: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency John van Oppen (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Saku Ytti (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mark Tinka (Jan 19)