nanog mailing list archives
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:50:10 +0200
On Thursday, February 06, 2014 09:04:40 PM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
No, you don't. It works perfectly well without direct port-to-port communication, you just have to align L3 configuration with this L2 behavior (which can be done in IPv6 but not in IPv4). IPv6 can be made to work without on-link /64, with only DHCPv6 IA_NA (optional) and only DHCPv6-PD. This means all communication goes via the router which then is perfectly aligned with how the L2 looks like with port isolation/private vlan.
Yep. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems, (continued)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)