nanog mailing list archives
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:46:54 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Mark Tinka wrote:
I'm just saying DHCP is better than PPPoE if you're greenfielding FTTH deployments today, and I'm not sure you entirely disagree.
We're in violent agreement it seems. My only beef was that it seemed like you were implying this was something new.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems, (continued)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Måns Nilsson (Feb 05)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems cdel.firsthand.net (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jean-Francois Mezei (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Måns Nilsson (Feb 05)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)